So, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, is speaking at my school on Monday as part of the annual World Leaders Forum. It was rather abruptly announced last Wednesday, and registration closed about 30 minutes after the announcement.
I was one of the few who happened to get a spot.
It was pretty much by chance; I refreshed Bwog and saw it posted, followed the link, and registered. I didn't even get it until afterward how hard it actually was to get a spot. Of course, the fact that he's speaking here has touched off the first campus scandal of the year. (Last year's biggie was the Jim Gilchrist event that got shut down by protesters, which started outlets like Fox News and NY Sun calling us "fascist liberal anarchists" and "University of Havana-North.") Fox News is lunging at Columbia again over this, to no one's surprise. A lot of other people from all sides of the political spectrum have also been critical.
Ahmadinejad is probably thought to be more abhorrent than the Minutemen to most people (if you'll temporarily excuse the moral relativism), and for that reason he himself is less controversial in the sense that damn near everyone on this campus is going to disagree with damn near everything he does and says. But having him as a speaker is obviously more controversial. Namely, by giving him a public stage at a generally respected university, are we legitimizing his beliefs and actions? I emphatically believe that that isn't the case. I find Ahmadinejad and his actions despicable; additionally, the fact that George W Bush opposes him does not make Admadinejad my friend, as some are insinuating about the "liberals" at Columbia. Lee Bollinger (the president of the university) made a statement that pretty much sums up how I feel about it. After explaining the format of the event (he's starting with a critique of Ahmadinejad with respect to denial of the Holocaust, destruction of Israel, terrorism, nuclear power, civil rights, and suppression and imprisonment of scholars and journalists; the time is split between Ahmadinejad talking and questions and answers), he wrote:
"I would like to add a few comments on the principles that underlie this event. Columbia, as a community dedicated to learning and scholarship, is committed to confronting ideas—to understand the world as it is and as it might be. To fulfill this mission we must respect and defend the rights of our schools, our deans and our faculty to create programming for academic purposes. Necessarily, on occasion this will bring us into contact with beliefs many, most or even all of us will find offensive and even odious. We trust our community, including our students, to be fully capable of dealing with these occasions, through the powers of dialogue and reason.
I would also like to invoke a major theme in the development of freedom of speech as a central value in our society. It should never be thought that merely to listen to ideas we deplore in any way implies our endorsement of those ideas, or the weakness of our resolve to resist those ideas or our naiveté about the very real dangers inherent in such ideas. It is a critical premise of freedom of speech that we do not honor the dishonorable when we open the public forum to their voices. To hold otherwise would make vigorous debate impossible.
That such a forum could not take place on a university campus in Iran today sharpens the point of what we do here. To commit oneself to a life—and a civil society—prepared to examine critically all ideas arises from a deep faith in the myriad benefits of a long-term process of meeting bad beliefs with better beliefs and hateful words with wiser words. That faith in freedom has always been and remains today our nation’s most potent weapon against repressive regimes everywhere in the world."
It's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and I'm grateful that I got a spot. Should be interesting, to say the least.
(I also got a spot to hear Željko Komšić, Presidency Chairman of Bosnia and Herzegovina, on Thursday. That one hasn't filled up quite yet, though.)
I was one of the few who happened to get a spot.
It was pretty much by chance; I refreshed Bwog and saw it posted, followed the link, and registered. I didn't even get it until afterward how hard it actually was to get a spot. Of course, the fact that he's speaking here has touched off the first campus scandal of the year. (Last year's biggie was the Jim Gilchrist event that got shut down by protesters, which started outlets like Fox News and NY Sun calling us "fascist liberal anarchists" and "University of Havana-North.") Fox News is lunging at Columbia again over this, to no one's surprise. A lot of other people from all sides of the political spectrum have also been critical.
Ahmadinejad is probably thought to be more abhorrent than the Minutemen to most people (if you'll temporarily excuse the moral relativism), and for that reason he himself is less controversial in the sense that damn near everyone on this campus is going to disagree with damn near everything he does and says. But having him as a speaker is obviously more controversial. Namely, by giving him a public stage at a generally respected university, are we legitimizing his beliefs and actions? I emphatically believe that that isn't the case. I find Ahmadinejad and his actions despicable; additionally, the fact that George W Bush opposes him does not make Admadinejad my friend, as some are insinuating about the "liberals" at Columbia. Lee Bollinger (the president of the university) made a statement that pretty much sums up how I feel about it. After explaining the format of the event (he's starting with a critique of Ahmadinejad with respect to denial of the Holocaust, destruction of Israel, terrorism, nuclear power, civil rights, and suppression and imprisonment of scholars and journalists; the time is split between Ahmadinejad talking and questions and answers), he wrote:
"I would like to add a few comments on the principles that underlie this event. Columbia, as a community dedicated to learning and scholarship, is committed to confronting ideas—to understand the world as it is and as it might be. To fulfill this mission we must respect and defend the rights of our schools, our deans and our faculty to create programming for academic purposes. Necessarily, on occasion this will bring us into contact with beliefs many, most or even all of us will find offensive and even odious. We trust our community, including our students, to be fully capable of dealing with these occasions, through the powers of dialogue and reason.
I would also like to invoke a major theme in the development of freedom of speech as a central value in our society. It should never be thought that merely to listen to ideas we deplore in any way implies our endorsement of those ideas, or the weakness of our resolve to resist those ideas or our naiveté about the very real dangers inherent in such ideas. It is a critical premise of freedom of speech that we do not honor the dishonorable when we open the public forum to their voices. To hold otherwise would make vigorous debate impossible.
That such a forum could not take place on a university campus in Iran today sharpens the point of what we do here. To commit oneself to a life—and a civil society—prepared to examine critically all ideas arises from a deep faith in the myriad benefits of a long-term process of meeting bad beliefs with better beliefs and hateful words with wiser words. That faith in freedom has always been and remains today our nation’s most potent weapon against repressive regimes everywhere in the world."
It's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and I'm grateful that I got a spot. Should be interesting, to say the least.
(I also got a spot to hear Željko Komšić, Presidency Chairman of Bosnia and Herzegovina, on Thursday. That one hasn't filled up quite yet, though.)
- Mood:
contemplative
Guatemala heads for run-off vote
Ex-general to face Leftist In Guatemala Runoff; "election campaign tainted by worst political violence since the end of the civil war"
Complex defeat for Nobel Winner in Guatemala
The reporter is writing from Santiago Atitlán. The slide show is good, too.
Ex-general to face Leftist In Guatemala Runoff; "election campaign tainted by worst political violence since the end of the civil war"
Complex defeat for Nobel Winner in Guatemala
The reporter is writing from Santiago Atitlán. The slide show is good, too.
Ten years and 4000 pages later, all finished at 10:32.
Thank you J.K. Rowling!
Thank you J.K. Rowling!
I HAVE MY BOOK!!! I am about to start reading. The beginning of the end...
Very uncomfortable-to-read, disturbing science article from the NYT: The Universe, Expanding Beyond All Understanding. Read it please.
On the flip side, very funny blog: Passive-Aggressive Notes from Rommates, Neighbors, Coworkers, and Strangers. You should check that out too.
On the flip side, very funny blog: Passive-Aggressive Notes from Rommates, Neighbors, Coworkers, and Strangers. You should check that out too.
Go to work, clean up my room, eat Chipotle with Dom -- this being legal business is crazy!
Also, best debate blog ever: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselectio ns08/story/0,,2096379,00.html I lol'd many times.
Also, best debate blog ever: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselectio
I just finished "The Departed." I wish I had seen it on the big screen. HOLY SHIT what a good movie.
This will hopefully be interesting, at least. I really don't know a whole lot about it, just that it's supposed to be "nontraditional," whatever that's going to wind up meaning (besides six people playing one person -- in contrast to the movie I watched for history last semester, with one guy playing six people).

This is the first time I've seen the poster, and I like that. Plus, Cate Blanchett. And Batman.
Speaking of Batman, July '08 cannot come fast enough in that respect. (In terms of graduating college, it can take its sweet time.) "Batman Begins" was awesome (I think my suite watched it three different times that it was on cable last year), hence "Dark Knight" deserves good faith, even with the interesting choice for The Joker. (I don't deny Heath Ledger -- another Bob Dylan -- has acting chops, but The Joker?) They also ditched the weakest link, Katie Holmes, in favor of Maggie Gyllenhaal, who is rad and can, y'know, act.
On the less mature side of things, I want to see "Knocked Up." I've heard it's funny, and the writer did both "40 Year Old Virgin," which I really liked, and "Freaks and Geeks," one of the best TV shows ever. He's also doing "Walk Hard," a musician biopic parody with John C. Reilly.

This is the first time I've seen the poster, and I like that. Plus, Cate Blanchett. And Batman.
Speaking of Batman, July '08 cannot come fast enough in that respect. (In terms of graduating college, it can take its sweet time.) "Batman Begins" was awesome (I think my suite watched it three different times that it was on cable last year), hence "Dark Knight" deserves good faith, even with the interesting choice for The Joker. (I don't deny Heath Ledger -- another Bob Dylan -- has acting chops, but The Joker?) They also ditched the weakest link, Katie Holmes, in favor of Maggie Gyllenhaal, who is rad and can, y'know, act.
On the less mature side of things, I want to see "Knocked Up." I've heard it's funny, and the writer did both "40 Year Old Virgin," which I really liked, and "Freaks and Geeks," one of the best TV shows ever. He's also doing "Walk Hard," a musician biopic parody with John C. Reilly.
